Nota bene: How do I write a good title?
No, you are not to repeat tags in the title unless it can't be ommitted for clarity. Example follows:
Error during create Oracle Schema: 4312563392934939394020192349502 1
tags: oracle oracle-schema
In this case we see that the tags1 are repeated in the question title, but if it merely read:
If you look at the timeline for that question you will see an entry
bumped by community user
Some questions are occasionally "bumped" by the community user. See this meta answer
The Community user randomly bumps old, unanswered questions to bring them to the attention of users and [maybe] get them answered
Couchbase is a Document-Oriented NoSQL Database according to the title of their home page: that puts it on-topic, though of course the NoSQL market is more fragmented and more cutting-edge, meaning each DB has it's own niche and the pool of Q&A here may never be big.
It does seem to be related from a technology perspective to CouchDB, though not so ...
Your question is answered in the Stack Exchange FAQ:
How does deleting work? What can cause a post to be deleted, and what does that actually mean? What are the criteria for deletion?
You can typically delete your own posts at will; for exceptions, see When can’t I delete my own post? below. To delete a post, just use the delete link below it.
Not all closures will fall precisely into the exact interpretation of the wording jammed into generic close reason text. No matter how much we fiddle with that text, someone is not going to be happy that it didn't 100% accurately reflect the closure reason behind their question.
In this case, I'm not sure there's a more accurate close reason for "give me ...
Assuming the 'too trivial' premise is correct (if it is not, please disconsider), perhaps we could improve the close reason to:
"Too localized - this could be because your code has a typo, basic error, or it is not relevant to most of our audience, or is too trivial. Consider revising your question so that it appeals to a broader audience. As it ...
In this case, I would take a moment to explain exactly why this fixed it, maybe some sort of 'brief lesson on the importance of only joining to what you need'.
By taking a moment to type just a brief little couple of sentences, you can turn what was merely a few words response into something that seems to have quite a bit of substance to it. And you've ...
My philosophy has been: if I've added a comment (whether short or simple) and it ends up being the answer, and the OP tells me "thanks, that solved my problem!" I'll convert it to an answer. But I agree that it can help make it more substantial if you add some fluff, context, an example, etc. And I usually do that. Here is an SO example from today - my ...
If you open up the Developer Console (F12) in Chrome and switch to the sources tab, you will find that some portions of the sites you are visiting are being serviced from different domains on the internet.
Here is a sample output of what the dba.meta.stackexchange.com site looks like source-wise:
I would have left the question to be answered in the future, if not for you, maybe for others.
I'll give you some reasons:
maybe in the future someone will habe the same problem and would be grateful for an answer
the question has already sparked some interest (the comments and the favorite show this), thus someone is interested in an answer