-2

"Quotes "in" the titles" of text, are backwards when nested. However they don't get quotified from the double-apos in the body. So things look right in the body, but not in the rendered title or on the question-index page. I'd put this on MSO but I'm banned from asking questions there. Clearly the intent should be to render on the basis of the world boundary.

  • Either double-apos should be typographically quotified everywhere, or nowhere.
  • It should be rendered on the basis of the word boundary if quote_count / 2 > 1
  • Shog9, guess who the community respects more.. me, or you? Hint: I have more EXP than you here. – Evan Carroll May 8 '12 at 23:02
  • And, interestingly enough, you still have Diamond-Mod status. – Evan Carroll May 8 '12 at 23:03
6

Out of all the questions posted on Database Administrators, only two have stacked quotes:

ORA-04031: unable to allocate bytes of shared memory ("","","","")

ORA-01555: snapshot too old: rollback segment number with name "" too small

...and both of those render correctly. Only one question has nested quotes:

How do I resolve Postgresql error, 'no collation was derived for column "foo" with collatable type citext'?

Given how rare this is, and how easy it is to avoid or work around, I can't see a purpose to handling these cases differently.

  • So you admit that my logic would more often render the desired result, but you still reject the concept because it requires more work at StackExchange.. What does Jeff even pay you guys to do? – Evan Carroll May 9 '12 at 15:35
  • Actually, no - I haven't implemented or tested your logic to see if it breaks anything. So I don't know if the results are any more likely to be correct. I just know that - in the context of this site - there's precious little benefit. – Shog9 May 9 '12 at 15:58
  • 1
    Right, but in the context of every stack-exchange site my grand plan for quoting utopia could revolutionize the industry. – Evan Carroll May 9 '12 at 16:30
  • Technically in the case of the first example, it does the right thing here. – jcolebrand May 9 '12 at 21:15
2

You're doing it wrong. You can't nest quotes like that. The proper form is:

"Quotes 'in' the titles", are backwards "when 'nested' or 'stacked'"

When nesting quotes, you switch from double to single quotes.

  • 1
    and when you need 3 levels of nesting? Or 4? Or 42? – ypercubeᵀᴹ May 9 '12 at 12:08
  • 1
    @ypercube: To English.SE! – Josh May 9 '12 at 13:16
  • 1
    And, what if you're quoting an error message that has double-quotes in it too. How about addressing the problem rather than establishing a workaround? What's wrong with the suggestion as-is? – Evan Carroll May 9 '12 at 15:35
  • @EvanCarroll what's wrong with your question as it is now? The title is grammatically correct and the body contains a blockquote (using >) with the exact error message. Seems like a perfect fix to me! – Josh May 9 '12 at 15:38

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .