4

Do you understand ? How about ?

It sounds like unhelpful marketing speak.

All our tags should be nouns. Any tags that are not nouns should be renamed as such.

Do you agree?

  • Hope that edit helps. Additionally, I think that verbs or nouns are appropriate, meta.stackexchange.com/questions/49455/… this has been brought up before as a network effect and has not been properly decided as one way or the other, but if Grace thinks they're not as useful, I agree with Grace. I say we can accept that non-actual-product adjectives are just superfluous. – jcolebrand May 1 '12 at 16:28
  • +1 - I think adjective tags by themselves are incomplete. What does relational mean on its own? – JNK May 10 '12 at 14:17
2

Some tags could replace it with , but then similar compound tags would have to be created for those that do not fit this new tag. If a question is just tagged it probably needs another tag to provide context. While it may not be able to stand alone as a tag it still helps limit the scope of the question and is therefore useful.

  • Wouldn't hierarchy make more sense as a tag though? – JNK May 10 '12 at 19:11
  • @JKN For some of the other questions it would, but for hierarchical queries it would not. If you search Oracle documentation for example, Hierarchy doesn't return anything related to hierarchical queries (at least not in the first 10 pages of results), but Hierarchical does. Compare oracle.com/pls/db112/… and oracle.com/pls/db112/…. – Leigh Riffel May 11 '12 at 12:43

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .