During review, I see that a lot of people vote to close questions as “too localized” when I would think they are actually too broad.
One example is here.
There is no typo, basic error, and I think it can be interesting for a lot of people to know why their performance with SQL Server replication is not as good as they expected. I think that the question is not answerable because it contains too little information that allows to diagnose the problem.
Is my understanding wrong? I know that there is always some room for personal judgement, but I'd like to understand how the majority perceives the meaning of “too localized”.