4

Day after day we see many questions that do not have a RDBMS tagged, which got me thinking (a miracle, I know) - Why don't we have a custom closure reason of "RDBMS Not Specified" added?

  • 2
    How would that be different from unclear + a comment about the missing (R)DBMS? – dezso Mar 29 '17 at 15:07
  • 1
    @dezso My laziness – Philᵀᴹ Mar 29 '17 at 15:11
4

We can only have five active close reasons, and we are at that limit now.

You can always add a custom close reason when you vote to close. We do review those from time to time to see if there is a need to change one of the existing standard reasons.

If specifying the database is crucial to answering the question, I would have thought that the "unclear what you're asking" reason would suffice.

Related: Why is RDBMS Type not a required field on this exchange?

Suggestions about improving the initial tags and new-user question experience:

Having better questions in the first iteration seems preferable to adding a new close reason.

2

Because

indicates the question is about the language, not any specific RDBMS.

  • 3
    You mean it should indicate that, right? ;) – dezso Mar 29 '17 at 15:07
  • 1
    good point, @dezso - when I just re-read my answer, I almost laughed out loud. I thought to myself, "if only that were true". – Max Vernon Mar 29 '17 at 19:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .