I've started seeing this strongly worded message recently when clicking the Review link:
You have approved numerous edits or first posts that were blatantly bad and needed editing or should not have been posted. We have the review queues for a reason, and you are not living up to that reason.
Checking back my edits I cannot see what is so blatantly bad about them. There were a couple of occasions when someone else added a tag to questions that I had edited. None of my edits were rejected; none of the questions and answers I reviewed were downvoted or closed. I'd like to understand what is it that I'm doing blatantly wrong and what I should do to improve.
Some examples:
Multiple SELECT vs single SELECT over TCIP
- I edited the question
- question not downvoted, edit not reverted, question has an accepted answer
- no action needed
- question not downvoted, has an answer
Cube processing either takes too long or fails
- edited answer, edits accepted
- answer not downvoted
https://dba.stackexchange.com/posts/66653/revisions
- edited answer, edits accepted
Compare two similar Postgres databases for differences
- no action needed
- question later edited (tag added), has an accepted answer
SQL Server instance using only a few hundred MB. Well below the minimum server memory setting
- no action needed
- question later edited by author, has an accepted answer
Redo log size results into performance degrade
- no action needed
- question lated edited (tag added), has an accepted answer
https://dba.stackexchange.com/posts/66543/revisions
- made an accepted edit
- question not downvoted, has an answer